الشاهد القرآني عند الدكتور أحمد حسن كحيل في كتابه التبيان في تصريف الأسماء

Abstract

The primary motivation for using evidence stems from the fear of losing the language of the Quran, a concern attributed to the phenomenon known as lahan (linguistic error), which spread in communities due to interaction with other nations. Traces of this phenomenon are evident in ancient books, leading early scholars to address it through valuale sources, particularly during the period from the latter half of the second century AH to the fourth century AH. Synonyms for the term evidence have been recorded in classical grammar texts, such as inference, representation, andargumentation. Evidence comprises verified and decisive reports that validate the correctness of a grammatical rule or opinion. It is often employed in debates where disputes arise, providing support for rules with concrete proof. This fascination with evidence grew to the extent of inspiring the compilation of books dedicated to evidence, rather than mere citation. Despite the Quran being regarded as the ultimate text, early scholars surprisingly overlooked its use as evidence, instead leaning toward fabricated examples. This shift is attributed to the phenomenon of religious bias. This research is divided into an introduction, a preamble titled "His Methodology in Establishing Quranic Evidence," and two main sections: Quranic Evidence in Morphological Issues and Quranic Evidence in Phonological Issues. The study concludes with a summary of key findings, followed by endnotes, sources, and references.